Tuesday, February 20, 2018

Letter to Congressmen and Senators on Gun Congrol

I wrote the following letter to Senators Cornyn and Cruz and Congressman Mac Thornberry on February 20, 2018.  I also sent it tot he White House.  Anyone who wishes to copy and send the recommendations in my letter to their representatives in Washington is free to do so.  I simply ask that you acknowledge that the recommendations are written by Jim Burleson and me.

________________________________________________


20 February 2018

Dear Congressman Mac Thornberry:

I am a current resident in Canyon, Texas.  I am also a retired municipal deputy police chief from New Mexico, and recently retired criminal justice professor in the State University of New York system where I taught criminology and constitutional law.  The last six years of my post-secondary education career in New York was spent as an academic dean and associate vice president.

Like the rest of the country, my friends and I have been discussing gun control in the wake of the Florida mass shooting.  I presented some recommendations to my friends and a few have suggested that I present these recommendations to you.  In addition to my recommendations, a friend and former colleague, Jim Burleson, a former deputy director of the New Mexico Law Enforcement Academy has added suggestions to my list.  His and my recommendations for legislation are included in this list.

Admittedly, it is not a perfect list for legislation, but it is a start and I believe it would go a long way toward addressing the problem we currently have.  The stark reality is that no matter what is done now or in the future, someone will find a way around the law while others will simply continue to flat out break it.

Here are our recommendations with footnoted comments.  The list is lengthy, but I do hope you review and consider these action items as part of a comprehensive approach to protecting our children in schools while at the same time protecting those who want to secure their Second Amendment rights.  The NRA probably wouldn’t like some of these suggestions.

Regards,
Gregory B. Talley
115 Nicci Lane
Canyon, TX 79015
gregory.talley@yahoo.com


1.     Require that all purchasers of any semi-automatic firearm except for those that fire .22 caliber bullets, be at least 21-years-old.[1]
2.     Require all first-time purchasers of any firearm complete an approved gun safety course.[2]
3.     Continue the instant background check system.[3]
4.     Require at the time of purchase of a firearm that the buyer complete an approved (by a board of psychologists) short psychological screening test (perhaps a section of the MMPI) regardless of the number of firearms a person has purchased in the past, which test can be administered by the seller and be automatically evaluated electronically.  The psychological screening is to be completed by a non-government agency, subject to review by court order in the event of an unlawful shooting.  Failures of the screening would be appealed through an in-person evaluation by a licensed psychologist and ruled upon by a judge.[4]
5.     Except for automatic weapons already permitted by law (pre-1986 manufactured), continue to outlaw the possession of automatic weapons.
6.     Rather than prohibit the addition of items that converts a semi-automatic weapon to an automatic weapon, prohibit the addition of ANY item to a semi-automatic weapon that converts it to firing more than one bullet at a time with a trigger pull, regardless of the rate of fire.[5]
7.     Restrict the sale of video games that depict the shooting of weapons at people or animals, using edged weapons to kill or injure a person, the use of explosive devices, or the use of any other item to kill or injure a person to persons over the age of 21.[6]
8.     Hire retired police or former honorably discharged military members to provide armed presence on school campuses.[7]
9.     Require any person except sworn law enforcement officers to pass through a magnetometer or be subjected to a visual or pat-down search upon entering a school.[8]
10.  Require in-service training to teachers at all grade levels to complete a course that helps them to identify potentially dangerous students and provide the means for them to report their suspicions to school administrators, school counselors and/or school mental health personnel, and the subject student’s parents or guardians.  Assure that there are no adverse repercussions directed to teachers making good faith reports.
11.  No federal funds for any hospital not equipped with a mental hold area manned with qualified personnel.
12.  A comprehensive data base for mental health checks accessible to police, judicial and gun sales.
13.  Expanded family courts to hear wide varieties of mental health cases.
14.  Mandatory reporting requirements for mental health related danger on par with similar requirements for child abuse.
15.   



[1] Ruger makes a popular rifle (10-22) as does Marlin.  There are probably other popular semi-automatic rifles suitable for target practice and plinking.  Removing these from permissible firearms would probably meet with strong objection.

[2] Hunter safety and NRA firearm safety courses are readily available and for a nominal fee.

[3] We know that the instant background checks are not perfect, but they need to continue.  If there are things to beef these up then they should be included.

[4] I received a few comments about this particular recommendation; However, something is better than nothing.  Those administering the test need to be trained in administering.  There are sufficient resources out there to score such a test.  When I was in law enforcement we used a psychological screening test that rooted out the most unsuitable applicants.  Some, we learned, were downright dangerous.  Such a screening as a designated section of the MMPI could quickly be administered and scored by an outside vendor.

[5] Doing this will make it unnecessary to come back every other year to adopt new legislation that converts a semi-automatic weapon to a full automatic.

[6] I can hear the First Amendment supporters and manufacturers of video games (and even violent movies) crying foul on this already.  That said, we are already talking about Second Amendment restrictions as well as acknowledging those that are in place.  There is adequate research out there to show that the power of suggestion of these games and videos are indeed powerful and influential.  It’s time to dial it back.

[7] Former police and military police already have a world of training.  They would need training dealing with school security and dealing with youth.  Obviously, they would need to maintain certain certifications in firearms, first aid, etc.

[8] This does not have to be intrusive and it doesn’t have to expensive and lengthy.  It does present problems concerning the entry of students, faculty, and staff during high volume traffic hours.  Though not likely agreeable with the NEA, even teachers and staff could be used in this process.  Another problem would be things such as basketball games, but the object here is to keep firearms out of the schools.


No comments:

Post a Comment