NOTE: This is long.
I’ve had some thoughts about this last mid-term election
that we just experienced. Doesn’t
everybody?
In spite of what the President has tried to pass off as a
poor showing of the electorate and that had there been more people voting this
year that results would have been different, I beg to differ with him. I believe that some very clear messages have
been delivered and that he, as well as many of us, is overlooking a bigger
picture.
Most of the attention this year has been focused on the
Senate races across the country.
Everybody knows that Republicans needed to capture (and hold onto) six
seats to gain control of the Senate.
That margin was easily achieved.
There are two “howevers” that need to be considered in the context of
this election. First, not every state
was electing senators, which can account for much of the poor turnout. Had every state been electing a senator there
would have been a much higher turnout in this past election. If the President is wise, he should consider
the election results as a representative sample of the larger population had
every state in the country been able to vote for a Senate seat.
The other bigger “however” though is what went on in the
largely ignored House election. The
media spent so much time focusing on the Senate that they all but ignored the
House. Perhaps the media believed that
since the House was already in the hands of the Republicans that they just
assumed that it would continue to be so with no big changes. You would expect that from a press that leans
to the left. It is like saying, “If you
ignore it, it will go away.” Well, it
didn’t go away. You see, Republicans
soundly outdistanced Democrats in the House by adding more seats to the right
than what they had before Tuesday. Republicans
now have well over 240 seats in the House while Democrats have only 175 (plus
or minus). “So what?” you ask. Well, the House is often referred to as the “People’s
Chamber” in Congress and if you now look at a red and blue House map of the
United States following Tuesday’s election, you will see that the map is
largely red. There is not enough blue on
the map to make any shade of purple.
Lots of exit polls were taken during this past election and
in spite of what President Obama wants you to believe, this election was in
fact about him. The American public is
tired of the failed policies. No, the
American public is angry over the failed policies. And, the American public is angry over the
direction that our nation is headed. This
election was a referendum on his job as president and on his agendas. Is it any wonder that only a small handful of
Democratic candidates for any office wanted Mr. Obama to endorse them? Yet, Republican candidates were more than
happy to have Mitt Romney show up on their doorstep.
It would be easy for some to say that the anger and
discontent was stirred up by FOX News and that the money machine of the Koch
brothers is responsible for what happened.
This is where we insert another “however” into the dialogue. Such assertions overlooks the very biased
CNN, MSNBC, and the other three major network news (or more appropriately
defined as “opinion”) outlets. It also
disregards the nearly $75,000,000 donation to democrats from the Steyer family,
or the $20,000,000 from Michael Bloomberg to democrats, or the $8,000,000 from
Fred Eychaner of Newsweb Corp. to democrats.
Then, let us not overlook the $3,700,000 to democrats from George
Soros. The reality is that according to
Forbes list of billionaires, of the 22 billionaires that contributed to
political actions, 13 of them contributed to liberal candidates or candidates
affiliated with the Democratic Party. If
you want to look at bottom dollars, consider then that the Democratic Party has
successfully raised $1,152,389,442 (I’ll save you the trouble of counting
digits—that is trillion) over the last 25 years compared to Republican
$736,075,113 (IJReview). Oh, and did I
mention that the Koch Brothers rank Number 59 in the Big Donors to Political
Parties category? Unions gave a sweet
$278 million to Democrats. The Honorable
Mr. Senator Harry Reid might want to reconsider calling the kettle black.
So, what does this all really mean? Here are some thoughts.
1 – I think it would be appropriate for President Obama to
pull out a city map of Washington, D.C. and calculate the distance between the
White House and the Capitol Building. If
he is careful, he will notice that the distance is the same from the White
House to the Capitol as it is from the Capitol to the White House. Not only that, but it might be more energy
efficient for him to make the trip to the Capitol than to have Congress
marching to the White House.
2 – I think it would be incumbent upon the President to look
at a map of the United States and see just how red that map really is. If he wants to preserve the Oval Office for
another Democrat, he would look long and hard at that map and disregard his
notion that only a small percentage of the American public spoke on Tuesday and
he best believe that America is angry over the direction she is going, his
pick-and-choose method of what laws to enforce, his liberal use of his pen and
telephone, and his unwillingness to go with the majority of the “People’s
Chamber”.
3 – I believe he should abandon the “my way or the highway”
approach to government.
4 – I believe he needs to come clean with all the scandals,
even if it means impeachment. Even I
would be willing to delve into the mysteries.
5 – I believe he needs to assemble a summit on health care
to scrap Obamacare and come up with something that will effectively replace it and
that will not hurt people like me and many people I know and will be a benefit
to those who want health care but who cannot afford it, all while not placing
huge burdens on physicians, many of whom have left the practice because of
Obamacare regulations. (Yes, that was a run-on sentence.)
6 – I believe he needs to break his fountain pen and let
Congress fix immigration and then sign the bill with a borrowed pen.
7 – I believe he needs to work with Congress to develop a
fair, simple, and equitable tax code.
Better yet, let Congress fill their constitutional duty to develop a
fair, simple, and equitable tax code.
8 – I believe he had better build up our national defense
and pay attention to his generals and admirals.
9 – If he knows what is good for him, he will abandon any
action that will restrict the Second Amendment.
10 – And if he is really smart, he will start to work on
restoring the honor of the First Amendment.
11 – I believe he needs to put tape over Michelle’s mouth
and put her on a word diet.
12 – I believe he needs to say, “O.K., folks, Common Core
isn’t making a whole lot of sense. Let’s
undo it before we permanently damage the brains of our children and their
parents.”
Now, I want to save the best for last.
To My Dear Republican and Conservative
Congressmen/Congresswomen:
1 – Grow up.
2 – Don’t blow it.
The American public has spoken as of last Tuesday and they are putting
their trust in you. Don’t get a big
head. Americans don’t like you much
more, if any more at all, than they do Mr. Obama. The Oval Office is yours to take. Don’t be stupid and try to put another Bush
in the White House. Don’t put somebody
up for the White House that is so ultra conservative that you will scare away
moderate Republicans and conservative Democrats.
3 – Newt Gingrich’s Contract with America was a good thought
that went awry. Hold that thought and
then act on it. As part of that
contract, p-l-e-a-s-e seal our borders and err on the safe side and deny legal
entry into this country to any person that belongs to a party that would in any
way want to restrict the freedoms that we so thanklessly enjoy.
4 – Take your cause to the American public and invite the
American public to take their cause to you.
5 – Insist that the President work with you. It does not have to be all about him. It isn’t about him at all and it isn’t about
you. It is about us. Americans.
We the People. Spend a little
less time in front of television cameras complaining and a little more time
listening to the public and holed up in your offices and in committees and in
your respective chambers finding synergistic solutions.
No comments:
Post a Comment